|Brother Michael & Matthew Bartholomew
(creator: Susanna Gregory)
|Continued from previous page
The Killer of Pilgrims (2010)
It is another entertaining story with most of the old familiar characters behaving just as they have always done (Michael's dreadful choir included) so it is hard to avoid the feeling that we have read it all before. Indeed there is even some repitition within the book itself as there are several minor things that we are told twice. But old, rich and unscrupulous Edith de Colvyll, (who imperiously demands treatment for her aching tooth but will not let Matthew pull it out) is a lively, arresting character. "You cannot buy your way into Heaven," Bartholomew warns her.
I also enjoyed the author's down-to-earth approach as when she described builders enjoying "a lewd discussion about the famously creative talents of Blaston's wife (who) worked as a prostitute to supplement the family income and could do amazing things with "a handful of chestnuts and a damp cloth". Perhaps it is just as well that we are not told exactly what it is that she does!
Background details (such as the bitter enmity between colleges and hostels and the violent game of camp-ball) are convincingly described - even if Matthew's use of the term "chain reaction" seems distinctly out of place in 1358. And it seems to be stretching it a bit when he is ordered by the master of his college to sleep with Edith's unattractive daughter so as to safeguard the old lady's financial support. It is left to Bartholomew to point out that this might have had exactly the opposite effect.
Neither Michael nor Bartholomew are really very shrewd detectives but they both make determined investigators. Mind you, the identity of the master mind behind the crimes is so unlikely that you can hardly blame them for getting it wrong! And the climax is way over the top.
Mystery in the Minster (2011)
The York setting is interesting, as is the rivalry between surgeon and physician, each with clearly defined job descriptions, although this will come as no surprise to readers of previous books. However the plot almost totally lacks any real zip or excitement, and this is true even when Michael and Bartholomew are left to drown with water rising all around them. You know they are certain to survive.
When Radeford (who taught law at Michaelhouse) claims to have discovered the identity of French spies but refuses to reveal what he has found to Michael until Langelee, the Master of Michaelhouse, is available, you know that he is likely to meet a sticky end. And so he does. The sinister Marmaduke, a defrocked priest who is now the guardian of St Sampson's toe, the nun Alice, the beautiful Lady Helen who enjoys arguing theological points and and her cousin Isabella, a novice who plans to stage the play The Conversion of the Harlot, turn out to be characters that are quite beyond belief.
The one bit that is quite exciting is when Bartholomew's book-bearer Cynric is taken prisoner and Bartholomew uncovers a body recently buried in a ruined church. But then both Michael and Bartholomew are taken prisoner - and, as usual the villain makes the fatal mistake by insisting on having long explanatory conversations with them. “Mother of God!" rightly mutters one of the conspirators. “More chatter?"
After all the murder and mayhem, we are told that, “It did not take long for Bartholomew, Michael, Langelee and Cynric to settle back into college life. The summer term was always busy, with students preparing for final disputations, and they threw themselves into the familiar routine with a sense of relief." So even they don't seem to take it all too seriously!
Murder by the Book (2012)
As always the Cambridge background (at a time when even the dissection of rats was forbidden) holds the interest, and the recent arrival of Holm, a new surgeon, may, Bartholomew hopes, lessen his load. But he turns out to be a thoroughly unpleasant character who has arranged to marry wealthy Julitta (a pretty young woman whom Bartholomew himself much admires) just to get his hands on her money, and he also proves to be a lazy, incompetent surgeon. It is he who blithely tells Bartholomew, "I wish it had been Gyseburne, Rougham or Meryfield who had died. Or you, for that matter." It was at this point, we are told, that Bartholomew "found himself beginning to dislike the man"!
This is the 18th book in the series, and it is hardly surprising if the author is rather running out of ideas. But if you don't try to take it too seriously, it provides another quite entertaining read, as when Bartholomew's old colleague Clippesby (who still talks to animals but does not seem to be quite as silly as he makes himself out to be) solemnly reports back on interesting things that his tame rat has overheard.
|Some of the covers look very similar. And so is the content.|